Автор24

Информация о работе

Подробнее о работе

Страница работы

“Social Media as Marketing tool for E-Health solutions promotion”

  • 57 страниц
  • 2016 год
  • 329 просмотров
  • 0 покупок
Автор работы

EkaterinaKonstantinovna

Большой опыт в написании работ, очень давно работаю на этом ресурсе, выполнила более 15000 заказов

2240 ₽

Работа будет доступна в твоём личном кабинете после покупки

Гарантия сервиса Автор24

Уникальность не ниже 50%

Фрагменты работ

New social media providing tools for various forms of online communication and interaction have rapidly changed social life and business environment. For customers, social media provide access to information on products from various sources, opportunities to share their opinions and experiences thus affecting purchasing decisions of other people, and to directly communicate with companies throughout the world. For organizations, social media provide opportunities for fast dissemination of information, receiving feedback and monitoring market situation. As social media become more and more widespread, its significance for marketers increases enormously. In Europe, almost half of the population are active social media users and their share is constantly growing (Kemp, 2016).
In this situation, companies cannot ignore social media in their marketing strategies and activities. Even if the company have no Facebook or Twitter account or its YouTube channel, social media affect its performance. Customers exchange information and discuss companies and products even when they are nor present and not distribute products electronically. Increasing interest of commercial firms, non-for-profit organizations, and governmental bodies is thus an inevitable step in developing their marketing systems.
Although increasing importance of social media marketing (SMM) is now widely recognized by both marketers and academic researchers, little is known of how social media are actually used by companies in different industries and sectors, and how effective these new tools are for promotional and other marketing purposes. A relevant task for a better understanding of the new channels of marketing communications is thus to study actual SMM practices in particular industries and market conditions.
One of new industries for which social media seem to be a natural choice for marketing is e-health, internally diverse industry developing new IT solutions for medical and healthcare tasks. Although e-health is by definition closely related to new information and communication technologies, and is deeply embedded in the virtual environment of the Internet, surprisingly little is known of how SMM is implemented by the companies working in this industry. The current study addresses this lack of evidence.

Table of figures 3
List of tables 4
List of abbreviations 5
1. Introduction 6
1.1 Problem Formulation 6
1.2 Objectives of the Study 7
2. E-Health solutions: An Industry Overview 8
2.1. Definitions of E-Health 8
2.2 E-Health Technologies 9
2.3 E-Health Advantages and Barriers 11
2.4 E-Health Policy and Regulatory Framework in EU 14
2.5 Global and European E-Health Markets: Size, Segmentation, Key trends 16
3. Social Media Marketing of E-Health Solutions 18
3.1 Social Media as a Tool for Marketing Promotion 18
3.2 Social Media Channels 20
3.3 Social Media Marketing of E-Health Solutions: A Literature Review 23
4. The Study of Social Media Use in E-Health Solution Promotion 25
4.1 Overview of the Study 25
4.2 Method 26
4.3 Results: Quantitative Analysis 27
4.4 Results: Case studies 36
5. Discussion 42
5.1 Using Social Media to Promote E-Health Solutions 42
5.2 Key Benefits and Challenges in Social Media Use for E-Health Solutions Promotion 48
5.3 Limitations and Further Research 51
References 54
Appendix A 58
Appendix B 59

Table of figures
Figure 1 Social media most frequently used by health app vendors (N20) 28
Figure 2 Facebook publication activity and social networking intensity 30
Figure 3 App vendors’ activity in Twitter 31
Figure 4 Comparison of Facebook and Twitter activity 32
Figure 5 Values of Cfb reflecting relative effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter promotional activity 34
Figure 6 SMM evaluational effectiveness of organizations using Twitter, likes per tweet 35
Figure 7 SMM networking effectiveness of organizations, followers per tweet 36


The present study has several important limitations which must be taking into account when interpreting the findings.
First, the sample included only 20 e-health organizations. The qualitative data obtained in the research is insufficient to make generalizations for the whole industry and to perform statistical analyses which could be used to study correlations between variables and impact of various moderating factors. Further researches can focus on broadening the scope of analysis and possible influence of mediating factors on social media activity. Among the most promising moderating factors are:
firm’s size;
type of organization;
regional presence;
business profile, i.e. types of e-health products and their importance for перу company’s business.
The second limitation is the focus on social media marketing activities on media channels controlled by organizations. Analysis of social media activity on companies’ official social media channels is just a part of SMM. Indeed, to maintain brand health and reputation, it is not sufficient to track and manage its perception on a company’s official Facebook or Twitter account. Social networks provide opportunities for customers to communicate with each other directly, using media channels which are not under organizational control. To manage brand-relevant information outside official channels is a much more difficult task needing significant efforts and skills. This part of SMM is a new important focus for further research.
The third limitation is a direct consequence of the methods used in the study. Simple qualitative statistics doesn’t provide detailed information on communication strategies used in each social media channel and the communicated content. Although elements of case study methodology helped to better understand SMM activity of e-health organizations, a deeper analysis of web-communication is needed to better understand promotional strategies and tactics used by organizations as well as customers’ behaviors and attitudes. Such methods as interviews with managers and customers’ surveys would help to better understand firms’ rationale for key SMM decisions and customers’ motivations and attitudes underlying their participation (or non-participation) in vendors’ social media activities.
Finally, the study was limited by the data gathered and analyzed. To better understand effectiveness of SMM, future research can include additional data, first of all, on firms’ financial and commercial performance.
Despite these important limitations, the present study provides first evidence on SMM promotional strategies actually used in one particular sector of e-health industry, health mobile apps. It showed that companies and organizations working in one industry take very different accounts on how to use social media to promote their products. Although social media is a must-have for marketers in current business environment, and especially in high-tech industries, its effective use is anything but a trivial thing. Both small and big organizations face difficulties in maintaining their presence in social media, and just a few can be treated as effective in dealing with them. The very notion of SMM effectiveness should be threated carefully: the present study showed preliminary evidence that there can be at least two distinct forms of social media effectiveness: evaluational and networking, the first being related to generating fast and positive feedback, and the second with establishing long-term relations.
Taking into account lack of evidence in this rapidly changing industry, the study can be considered as a first step toward a better understanding of e-health organizations’ use of social media for the promotion of their solutions.


Abu-Khousa, E., Mohamed, N., and Al-Jaroodi, J. (2012). E-Health cloud: Opportunities and Challenges. Future Internet, 4, pp. 621-645.
Anderson, J.G. (2007). Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, pp.480-483.
Antheunis, M.L., Tates, K., and Nieboer, T.E. (2013). Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in healthcare: Motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, pp.426-431.
Ball, M.J. and Lillis, J. (2001). E-health: Transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 61, pp.1-10.
Bazzani, M. et al. (2012). Enabling the IoT paradigm in e-health solutions through the VIRTUS middleware. In: 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. Liverpool, 2012, pp.1954-1959.
Bourdreaux, E.D. et al. (2014). Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4, pp. 363-371.
Bughin, J. (2015). Getting a sharper picture of social media’s influence. McKinsey&Company. URL: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/getting-a-sharper-picture-of-social-medias-influence. Retrieved on: 10.11.2016.
Burroughs, J. (2015). The regulatory challenges facing e-health. URL: http://www.experts.com/Articles/Regulatory-Challenges-Facing-E-Health-By-Jonathan-Burroughs. Retrieved on: 06.11.2016.
Charlesworth, A. (2015). An Introduction to Social Media Marketing. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Chou, W.S. et al. (2009). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e48.
Chui et al. (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking Value and Productivity Through Social Technologies. McKinsey Global Institute.
Coile, R.C. Jr. (2000). E-Health: Reinventing healthcare in the information age. Journal of Healthcare Management, 45, pp. 206-210.
Cowie, M.R. et al. (2016). E-Health: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 37, p.63-66.
DeLuca, J.M., Enmark, F., and Enmark, R. (2000). E-Health: The changing model of healthcare. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 17, pp.3-15.
Denecke, K. (2015). Health Web Science: Social Media Data for Healthcare. Cham: Springer.
Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Official Journal of the European Union, L 88, pp.45-65.
European Commission (2004). E-Health – making healthcare better for European citizens: An action plan for a European e-Health Area. Brussels: EC.
European Commission (2012). Action Plan 2012-2020 – Innovative Healthcare for the 21st century. Brussels: EC.
European Commission (2013). EU activities in the field of eHealth Interoperability and Standardisation: an overview. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-activities-field-ehealth-interoperability-and-standardisation-overview. Retrieved on: 07.11.2016.
European Commission (2014). Green Paper on mobile Health (“mHealth”). Brussels: EC.
European Directory of Health Apps 2012-2013 (2012). London: PatientView.
Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e20, pp.1-2.
Gensler, S. et al. (2013). Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27, pp.242-256.
Grajales III, F.J. (2014). Social media: A review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 165, e13.
GSMA (2012). mHealth and the EU regulatory framework for medical devices. London: GSMA.
GVR (2016). eHealth Market Analysis by Product, By Services, By End-Use and Segment Forecasts to 2022. URL: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/e-health-market. Retrieved on: 11.11.2016.
Hawn, C. (2009). Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28, pp.361-368.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, pp.59-68.
Kaye, R. et al. (2010). Barriers and success factors in health information technology: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Management and Marketing in Healthcare, 3, pp.163-175.
Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016. We Are Social Ltd. URL: http://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2016. Retrieved on: 14.11.2016.
Leeflang, P.S.H., Verhoef, P.C., Dahlstrom, P., and Freundt, T. (2014). Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal, 32, pp.1-12.
Lumpkin, J.R. (2000). E-Health, HIPAA, and beyond. Health Affairs, 19, pp. 148-151.
Mair, F.C. et al. (2009). Understanding the Implementation and Integration of e-Health Services: Research Report. National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation, 2009.
Miller, A.R. and Tucker, C. (2013). Active social media management: The case of health care. Information Systems Research, 24, pp. 52-70.
Moorhead, S.A. et al. (2013). A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e85.
Mordor Intelligence (2016). Global e-Health Market - By Application Type, Region - Trends, Market Shares, Forecasts (2015- 2020). URL: http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3421414/global-e-health-market-by-application-type. Retrieved on: 09.11.2016.
Mordor Intelligence (2016). Global E-health Market – Growth, Trends and Forecast (20156-2021). URL: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/e-health-market. Retrieved on: 09.11.2016.
Ngai, E.W.T. et al. (2015). Social media models, technologies, and applications: An academic review and case study. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115, pp.769-802.
Ooijevar, J.R. (2010). The influence of national healthcare regulation on E-Health business models: An exploratory comparative case study of four European healthcare markets. Twente: University of Twente.
P&S Market Research (2016). Global Telemedicine Market Size, Share, Development, Growth and Demand Forecasts to 2022. URL: https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/telemedicine-market. Retrieved on: 10.11.2016.
Parikh, S.V. and Huniewicz, P. (2015). E-Health: an overview of the uses of the Internet, social media, apps, and websites for mood disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, pp.13-17.
Peterson, B.E. et al. (2002). Electronic creation, submission, adjudication, and payment of health insurance claims. US Patent No 6343271 B1.
Peterson, S. (2012). 11 Super Mobile Medical Apps. Informationweek. URL: http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/11-super-mobile-medical-apps/d/d-id/1105143?page_number=1. Retrieved on: 12.11.2016.
Provost, W.A. (2002). Provider claim editing and settlement system. US Patent No 6341265 B1.
Rapp, L. (2014). Legal and Regulatory Challenges Facing mHealth in Europe. ITU.
Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., and Nabeth T. (2014). Social media in organizations: Leveraging personal and collective knowledge processes. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 24, pp. 74-93.
Riva, G. (2000). From telehealth to e-health: Internet and distributed virtual reality in health care. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, pp. 989-998.
Silverman, C. (2016). This analysis shows how fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News. Posted on Nov., 17, 2016. URL: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook?utm_term=.jbZ5RALmk#.tsZgepGDX. Retrieved on: 20.11.2016.
Thaker, S.I. et al. (2011). How U.S. hospitals use social media. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154, pp.707-708.
Thakeray, R. et al. (2008). Enchancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9, pp.338-343.
Tsimonis, G. and Dimitriadis, S. (2014). Brand strategies in social media. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 32, pp.328-344.
Valeri, L., Giesen, D., Jansen, P., and Klokgieters, K. (2010). Business Models for eHealth: Final Report. RAND Europe & Capgemini Consulting.
Van Velsen, L., Beaujean, D.J.M.A., and van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.W.C. (2013). Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13:23, pp.1-5.
Vedder, A., Cuijpers, C., Vantsiouri, P., and Ferrari, M.Z. (2014). The law as a ‘Catalyst and Facilitator’ for trust in e-Health: Challenges and opportunities. Law, Innovation and Technology, 6, pp.305-325.
Ventola, C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 39: 491-499.

Форма заказа новой работы

Не подошла эта работа?

Закажи новую работу, сделанную по твоим требованиям

Согласен с условиями политики конфиденциальности и  пользовательского соглашения

Фрагменты работ

New social media providing tools for various forms of online communication and interaction have rapidly changed social life and business environment. For customers, social media provide access to information on products from various sources, opportunities to share their opinions and experiences thus affecting purchasing decisions of other people, and to directly communicate with companies throughout the world. For organizations, social media provide opportunities for fast dissemination of information, receiving feedback and monitoring market situation. As social media become more and more widespread, its significance for marketers increases enormously. In Europe, almost half of the population are active social media users and their share is constantly growing (Kemp, 2016).
In this situation, companies cannot ignore social media in their marketing strategies and activities. Even if the company have no Facebook or Twitter account or its YouTube channel, social media affect its performance. Customers exchange information and discuss companies and products even when they are nor present and not distribute products electronically. Increasing interest of commercial firms, non-for-profit organizations, and governmental bodies is thus an inevitable step in developing their marketing systems.
Although increasing importance of social media marketing (SMM) is now widely recognized by both marketers and academic researchers, little is known of how social media are actually used by companies in different industries and sectors, and how effective these new tools are for promotional and other marketing purposes. A relevant task for a better understanding of the new channels of marketing communications is thus to study actual SMM practices in particular industries and market conditions.
One of new industries for which social media seem to be a natural choice for marketing is e-health, internally diverse industry developing new IT solutions for medical and healthcare tasks. Although e-health is by definition closely related to new information and communication technologies, and is deeply embedded in the virtual environment of the Internet, surprisingly little is known of how SMM is implemented by the companies working in this industry. The current study addresses this lack of evidence.

Table of figures 3
List of tables 4
List of abbreviations 5
1. Introduction 6
1.1 Problem Formulation 6
1.2 Objectives of the Study 7
2. E-Health solutions: An Industry Overview 8
2.1. Definitions of E-Health 8
2.2 E-Health Technologies 9
2.3 E-Health Advantages and Barriers 11
2.4 E-Health Policy and Regulatory Framework in EU 14
2.5 Global and European E-Health Markets: Size, Segmentation, Key trends 16
3. Social Media Marketing of E-Health Solutions 18
3.1 Social Media as a Tool for Marketing Promotion 18
3.2 Social Media Channels 20
3.3 Social Media Marketing of E-Health Solutions: A Literature Review 23
4. The Study of Social Media Use in E-Health Solution Promotion 25
4.1 Overview of the Study 25
4.2 Method 26
4.3 Results: Quantitative Analysis 27
4.4 Results: Case studies 36
5. Discussion 42
5.1 Using Social Media to Promote E-Health Solutions 42
5.2 Key Benefits and Challenges in Social Media Use for E-Health Solutions Promotion 48
5.3 Limitations and Further Research 51
References 54
Appendix A 58
Appendix B 59

Table of figures
Figure 1 Social media most frequently used by health app vendors (N20) 28
Figure 2 Facebook publication activity and social networking intensity 30
Figure 3 App vendors’ activity in Twitter 31
Figure 4 Comparison of Facebook and Twitter activity 32
Figure 5 Values of Cfb reflecting relative effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter promotional activity 34
Figure 6 SMM evaluational effectiveness of organizations using Twitter, likes per tweet 35
Figure 7 SMM networking effectiveness of organizations, followers per tweet 36


The present study has several important limitations which must be taking into account when interpreting the findings.
First, the sample included only 20 e-health organizations. The qualitative data obtained in the research is insufficient to make generalizations for the whole industry and to perform statistical analyses which could be used to study correlations between variables and impact of various moderating factors. Further researches can focus on broadening the scope of analysis and possible influence of mediating factors on social media activity. Among the most promising moderating factors are:
firm’s size;
type of organization;
regional presence;
business profile, i.e. types of e-health products and their importance for перу company’s business.
The second limitation is the focus on social media marketing activities on media channels controlled by organizations. Analysis of social media activity on companies’ official social media channels is just a part of SMM. Indeed, to maintain brand health and reputation, it is not sufficient to track and manage its perception on a company’s official Facebook or Twitter account. Social networks provide opportunities for customers to communicate with each other directly, using media channels which are not under organizational control. To manage brand-relevant information outside official channels is a much more difficult task needing significant efforts and skills. This part of SMM is a new important focus for further research.
The third limitation is a direct consequence of the methods used in the study. Simple qualitative statistics doesn’t provide detailed information on communication strategies used in each social media channel and the communicated content. Although elements of case study methodology helped to better understand SMM activity of e-health organizations, a deeper analysis of web-communication is needed to better understand promotional strategies and tactics used by organizations as well as customers’ behaviors and attitudes. Such methods as interviews with managers and customers’ surveys would help to better understand firms’ rationale for key SMM decisions and customers’ motivations and attitudes underlying their participation (or non-participation) in vendors’ social media activities.
Finally, the study was limited by the data gathered and analyzed. To better understand effectiveness of SMM, future research can include additional data, first of all, on firms’ financial and commercial performance.
Despite these important limitations, the present study provides first evidence on SMM promotional strategies actually used in one particular sector of e-health industry, health mobile apps. It showed that companies and organizations working in one industry take very different accounts on how to use social media to promote their products. Although social media is a must-have for marketers in current business environment, and especially in high-tech industries, its effective use is anything but a trivial thing. Both small and big organizations face difficulties in maintaining their presence in social media, and just a few can be treated as effective in dealing with them. The very notion of SMM effectiveness should be threated carefully: the present study showed preliminary evidence that there can be at least two distinct forms of social media effectiveness: evaluational and networking, the first being related to generating fast and positive feedback, and the second with establishing long-term relations.
Taking into account lack of evidence in this rapidly changing industry, the study can be considered as a first step toward a better understanding of e-health organizations’ use of social media for the promotion of their solutions.


Abu-Khousa, E., Mohamed, N., and Al-Jaroodi, J. (2012). E-Health cloud: Opportunities and Challenges. Future Internet, 4, pp. 621-645.
Anderson, J.G. (2007). Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, pp.480-483.
Antheunis, M.L., Tates, K., and Nieboer, T.E. (2013). Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in healthcare: Motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, pp.426-431.
Ball, M.J. and Lillis, J. (2001). E-health: Transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 61, pp.1-10.
Bazzani, M. et al. (2012). Enabling the IoT paradigm in e-health solutions through the VIRTUS middleware. In: 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. Liverpool, 2012, pp.1954-1959.
Bourdreaux, E.D. et al. (2014). Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4, pp. 363-371.
Bughin, J. (2015). Getting a sharper picture of social media’s influence. McKinsey&Company. URL: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/getting-a-sharper-picture-of-social-medias-influence. Retrieved on: 10.11.2016.
Burroughs, J. (2015). The regulatory challenges facing e-health. URL: http://www.experts.com/Articles/Regulatory-Challenges-Facing-E-Health-By-Jonathan-Burroughs. Retrieved on: 06.11.2016.
Charlesworth, A. (2015). An Introduction to Social Media Marketing. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Chou, W.S. et al. (2009). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e48.
Chui et al. (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking Value and Productivity Through Social Technologies. McKinsey Global Institute.
Coile, R.C. Jr. (2000). E-Health: Reinventing healthcare in the information age. Journal of Healthcare Management, 45, pp. 206-210.
Cowie, M.R. et al. (2016). E-Health: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 37, p.63-66.
DeLuca, J.M., Enmark, F., and Enmark, R. (2000). E-Health: The changing model of healthcare. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 17, pp.3-15.
Denecke, K. (2015). Health Web Science: Social Media Data for Healthcare. Cham: Springer.
Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Official Journal of the European Union, L 88, pp.45-65.
European Commission (2004). E-Health – making healthcare better for European citizens: An action plan for a European e-Health Area. Brussels: EC.
European Commission (2012). Action Plan 2012-2020 – Innovative Healthcare for the 21st century. Brussels: EC.
European Commission (2013). EU activities in the field of eHealth Interoperability and Standardisation: an overview. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-activities-field-ehealth-interoperability-and-standardisation-overview. Retrieved on: 07.11.2016.
European Commission (2014). Green Paper on mobile Health (“mHealth”). Brussels: EC.
European Directory of Health Apps 2012-2013 (2012). London: PatientView.
Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e20, pp.1-2.
Gensler, S. et al. (2013). Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27, pp.242-256.
Grajales III, F.J. (2014). Social media: A review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 165, e13.
GSMA (2012). mHealth and the EU regulatory framework for medical devices. London: GSMA.
GVR (2016). eHealth Market Analysis by Product, By Services, By End-Use and Segment Forecasts to 2022. URL: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/e-health-market. Retrieved on: 11.11.2016.
Hawn, C. (2009). Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28, pp.361-368.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, pp.59-68.
Kaye, R. et al. (2010). Barriers and success factors in health information technology: A practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Management and Marketing in Healthcare, 3, pp.163-175.
Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016. We Are Social Ltd. URL: http://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2016. Retrieved on: 14.11.2016.
Leeflang, P.S.H., Verhoef, P.C., Dahlstrom, P., and Freundt, T. (2014). Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal, 32, pp.1-12.
Lumpkin, J.R. (2000). E-Health, HIPAA, and beyond. Health Affairs, 19, pp. 148-151.
Mair, F.C. et al. (2009). Understanding the Implementation and Integration of e-Health Services: Research Report. National Coordinating Centre for the Service Delivery and Organisation, 2009.
Miller, A.R. and Tucker, C. (2013). Active social media management: The case of health care. Information Systems Research, 24, pp. 52-70.
Moorhead, S.A. et al. (2013). A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e85.
Mordor Intelligence (2016). Global e-Health Market - By Application Type, Region - Trends, Market Shares, Forecasts (2015- 2020). URL: http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/3421414/global-e-health-market-by-application-type. Retrieved on: 09.11.2016.
Mordor Intelligence (2016). Global E-health Market – Growth, Trends and Forecast (20156-2021). URL: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/e-health-market. Retrieved on: 09.11.2016.
Ngai, E.W.T. et al. (2015). Social media models, technologies, and applications: An academic review and case study. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115, pp.769-802.
Ooijevar, J.R. (2010). The influence of national healthcare regulation on E-Health business models: An exploratory comparative case study of four European healthcare markets. Twente: University of Twente.
P&S Market Research (2016). Global Telemedicine Market Size, Share, Development, Growth and Demand Forecasts to 2022. URL: https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/telemedicine-market. Retrieved on: 10.11.2016.
Parikh, S.V. and Huniewicz, P. (2015). E-Health: an overview of the uses of the Internet, social media, apps, and websites for mood disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, pp.13-17.
Peterson, B.E. et al. (2002). Electronic creation, submission, adjudication, and payment of health insurance claims. US Patent No 6343271 B1.
Peterson, S. (2012). 11 Super Mobile Medical Apps. Informationweek. URL: http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/11-super-mobile-medical-apps/d/d-id/1105143?page_number=1. Retrieved on: 12.11.2016.
Provost, W.A. (2002). Provider claim editing and settlement system. US Patent No 6341265 B1.
Rapp, L. (2014). Legal and Regulatory Challenges Facing mHealth in Europe. ITU.
Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., and Nabeth T. (2014). Social media in organizations: Leveraging personal and collective knowledge processes. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 24, pp. 74-93.
Riva, G. (2000). From telehealth to e-health: Internet and distributed virtual reality in health care. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, pp. 989-998.
Silverman, C. (2016). This analysis shows how fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News. Posted on Nov., 17, 2016. URL: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook?utm_term=.jbZ5RALmk#.tsZgepGDX. Retrieved on: 20.11.2016.
Thaker, S.I. et al. (2011). How U.S. hospitals use social media. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154, pp.707-708.
Thakeray, R. et al. (2008). Enchancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9, pp.338-343.
Tsimonis, G. and Dimitriadis, S. (2014). Brand strategies in social media. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 32, pp.328-344.
Valeri, L., Giesen, D., Jansen, P., and Klokgieters, K. (2010). Business Models for eHealth: Final Report. RAND Europe & Capgemini Consulting.
Van Velsen, L., Beaujean, D.J.M.A., and van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.W.C. (2013). Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13:23, pp.1-5.
Vedder, A., Cuijpers, C., Vantsiouri, P., and Ferrari, M.Z. (2014). The law as a ‘Catalyst and Facilitator’ for trust in e-Health: Challenges and opportunities. Law, Innovation and Technology, 6, pp.305-325.
Ventola, C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 39: 491-499.

Купить эту работу

“Social Media as Marketing tool for E-Health solutions promotion”

2240 ₽

или заказать новую

Лучшие эксперты сервиса ждут твоего задания

от 3000 ₽

Гарантии Автор24

Изображения работ

Страница работы
Страница работы
Страница работы

Понравилась эта работа?

или

1 сентября 2017 заказчик разместил работу

Выбранный эксперт:

Автор работы
EkaterinaKonstantinovna
4.5
Большой опыт в написании работ, очень давно работаю на этом ресурсе, выполнила более 15000 заказов
Купить эту работу vs Заказать новую
0 раз Куплено Выполняется индивидуально
Не менее 40%
Исполнитель, загружая работу в «Банк готовых работ» подтверждает, что уровень оригинальности работы составляет не менее 40%
Уникальность Выполняется индивидуально
Сразу в личном кабинете Доступность Срок 1—6 дней
2240 ₽ Цена от 3000 ₽

5 Похожих работ

Отзывы студентов

Отзыв Mizhgan42 об авторе EkaterinaKonstantinovna 2014-07-11
Дипломная работа

Работа выполнена качественно и буквально за считанные дни. Анна - настоящий талант. Человек, целиком и полностью посвятивший себя науке. Регулярно появляется онлайн, производит все необходимые доработки вплоть до защиты. И самое главное - выполняет работу с неподдельным интересом. Мне крупно повезло работать с таким профессионалом. Огромное Вам спасибо!

Общая оценка 5
Отзыв Алексей Михайлов об авторе EkaterinaKonstantinovna 2018-07-30
Дипломная работа

Благодарю!

Общая оценка 5
Отзыв valkirya32 об авторе EkaterinaKonstantinovna 2017-01-22
Дипломная работа

Отлично выполнена работа, корректировки все вносились без задержек, всегда на связи. Рекомендую всем. Цена-качество-время написания - все на отлично!

Общая оценка 5
Отзыв Ирина15 об авторе EkaterinaKonstantinovna 2017-06-06
Дипломная работа

Елена написала хорошую первую главу, было много корректировок и все чётко выполнялось, работой довольна. Спасибо большое!)

Общая оценка 5

другие учебные работы по предмету

Готовая работа

Особенности перевода на русский язык оригинального английского текста

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
1890 ₽
Готовая работа

Прагматическая адаптация переводов в публицистических текстах

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
900 ₽
Готовая работа

Эмоциональный концепт

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2240 ₽
Готовая работа

Словосложение в английском языке

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2800 ₽
Готовая работа

диплом Концепт время

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2000 ₽
Готовая работа

Средства выражение иронии в романе Der Campus Ditrich Schwaniz

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
3300 ₽
Готовая работа

Способы перевода английских имен собственных (на материале произведений дж. к. роулинг)

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
1200 ₽
Готовая работа

ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКИЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ ТИПОВ ТЕКСТА «ИНТЕРВЬЮ» (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ ИНТЕРВЬЮ СО ЗНАМЕНИТЫМИ ЛЮДЬМИ)

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2500 ₽
Готовая работа

Компьютерные технологии как обязательный компонент современного обучения иностранному языку

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2800 ₽
Готовая работа

Проблемы перевода юридических текстов

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
400 ₽
Готовая работа

Английская и русская вежливости в контексте культурных традиций

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
2800 ₽
Готовая работа

Орфоэпические особенности английского языка в Австралии

Уникальность: от 40%
Доступность: сразу
1000 ₽